Here's a high quality version for Britney Spears' Cosmopolitan cover. It looks better than what it seemed like on the LQ picture we had seen before. Although the photoshop is still a little too obvious.
Is it me or her cheeks don't look normal? At first I thought she looked exhausted (tired eyes), but when I opened the pic bigger, I saw that her cheeks just look weird. Too much photoshopping?
Couldn't they have just chosen another picture? one that doesn't look...hum...how can I say? Weird? I mean The body and face have nothing in common. The body is banging and she looks really tired. And yes the face seems glued to the body...Love Britney but this cover isn't flattering at all. Jennifer Lopez was nice on the cover last month...the uk cover.
That is one of the worst photo-shop jobs I've seen. Lately seems the photoshoppers have been getting lazy...either that or the people they work for are demanding the impossible.
"Make Brittany spears look like she did 10 years ago before K-Fed."
Um, I don't think there's a program out there that could accomplish such a magical feat of photo-shop wizardry
3 comments:
Is it me or her cheeks don't look normal?
At first I thought she looked exhausted (tired eyes), but when I opened the pic bigger, I saw that her cheeks just look weird. Too much photoshopping?
Couldn't they have just chosen another picture? one that doesn't look...hum...how can I say? Weird? I mean The body and face have nothing in common. The body is banging and she looks really tired. And yes the face seems glued to the body...Love Britney but this cover isn't flattering at all. Jennifer Lopez was nice on the cover last month...the uk cover.
That is one of the worst photo-shop jobs I've seen. Lately seems the photoshoppers have been getting lazy...either that or the people they work for are demanding the impossible.
"Make Brittany spears look like she did 10 years ago before K-Fed."
Um, I don't think there's a program out there that could accomplish such a magical feat of photo-shop wizardry
Post a Comment